NZ Idol......

Have your say about the latest band/album/zine/movie/DVD/show that you either loved or hated
User avatar
Lamb
Posts: 4218
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 7:21 pm

Postby Lamb » Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:34 pm

Lamb wrote:Ive got 9

User avatar
cirE
Posts: 17440
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: your face
Contact:

Postby cirE » Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:37 pm

Lamb wrote:
Lamb wrote:Ive got 9


you're the coolest lamb i know
Future Shock wrote:freudian slip, went downa likea sack o potatoes

Image
0.21 6.78 3.31

too square to be hip
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:13 pm
Location: k road
Contact:

Postby too square to be hip » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:25 pm

at least non eoof you have to work with her and have her talk about herself and her life ALL FUCKIN DAY...god kill me now
Life is one fuckin big frustration, paradox, contradiction. A constant striving to discover we know nothing.

kittenslayer

Postby kittenslayer » Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:13 pm

?! Wot is it that you do?

SOSA
Posts: 2274
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:32 pm

Postby SOSA » Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:28 pm

in the "bisuness" probably.

director of ugly hoez with fo fo'z

wouldnt be suprised if he hooked her up with the shoot.
Image

kittenslayer

Postby kittenslayer » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:50 pm

Liz_Shaw has sided with destiny church...

Destiny New Zealand are not just a one issue party. The family forms the foundation for their poiicies. If thry only had a family policy then they would be a one issue party. A one issue party would be the party developed in the west coast, the anti smoking ban party or the legalise cannabis party.

Yes, it is good that Destiny New Zealand represent those who are Christian in New Zealand.

Surely everyone will agree with me when I say that every sector and group in society has the right to be represented.

They are not neo nazis, you jsut have to look at their treaty policies to realise this. They have no intention to get rid of the treaty, they plan to uphold the principles of the treaty, as broad a term as that is.

And they also support immigration.

Might I add that they are not a communist party, and if you look back to the 1930s in Germany with hitler, that was a nazi state, and they were communists. This party is founded on right wing principles.

Also I don't see that there is anything wrong with not having the civil unions bill. I mean if you are truly in love then you shouldn't need that to be recognised legally. In fact, legal issues should be the last thing on your mind.

malibu
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:41 pm
Location: Mount Eden, Auckland
Contact:

Postby malibu » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:59 pm

big fucking deal that I talk about myself. is it now a crime?

Just a new update, there is one less reason to hassle me, my hair is now dark red again so you can't call me a ginger anymore.

kittenslayer

Postby kittenslayer » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:02 am

okay, i will just call you a fatty and a slappa now

diesel
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:22 am

Postby diesel » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:08 am

bwahaha

User avatar
Bruticus
Posts: 5792
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 3:12 pm
Location: Guadalcanal
Contact:

Postby Bruticus » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:18 am

kittenslayer wrote:Liz_Shaw has sided with destiny church...

if you look back to the 1930s in Germany with hitler, that was a nazi state, and they were communists.


WHAT?
Image
If I had a bag of chips I'd eat them

User avatar
David xvx Ludd
Posts: 3709
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: Auckland
Contact:

Postby David xvx Ludd » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:19 am

Might I add that they are not a communist party, and if you look back to the 1930s in Germany with hitler, that was a nazi state, and they were communists. This party is founded on right wing principles.


Liz, did you really write that?

You are an idiot. The Nazi Party was a right-wing party. It was a fascist party. The nazis loathed communism. Prior to Hitler's rise to power, fascists and communists would brawl in the streets.

"We stand for the maintenance of private property...we shall protect free enterprise as the most expedient, or rather the sole possible economic order." - Adolph Hitler

Socialism is based around public ownership of the means of production. Communism is a variant of socialism. The Nazi Party and other fascist parties believe(d) in private ownership. Moreover, they favoured conservative social values and so on.

You know nothing about these topics, yet you feel the need to open your idiotic mouth. Why is that? Do you just need the attention you get when someone calls you an idiot and disproves your idiotic claim?

Fuck Destiny.
Green | Vegan | Straight Edge | Tattooed | Lawyer | Cyclist | PMA

[url="http://about.me/david.tong"]Me[/url] | [url="http://www.p3foundation.org/"]My charity[/url] | [url="http://www.oxfam.org.nz/events/teams.asp?a=show_team_pages&eventid=30&teamid=6235"]My Trailkwalker team[/url]

User avatar
Juxtaposition Records
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 12:24 am
Location: AK West

Postby Juxtaposition Records » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:58 am

:lol:

probably on par with

FiveIronFan wrote:
<me> It pisses me off that the americans dropped nukes on japan when they had already surrendered
<flatmate> No they had to do that
<me> No they didnt! It was just to test their new toys out
<flatmate> No they had to otherwise hitler would have won and we would all be communist
I leave room in disgust


from the worst discussions thread (or whatever it is)

kittenslayer

Postby kittenslayer » Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:05 am

They were both right tho, Japan didn't surrender until after the nuke. Infact alot of them still want to fight even after the nukes are dropped. Frankly i think they deserved that after what they did in the war!!!!

User avatar
Juxtaposition Records
Posts: 635
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 12:24 am
Location: AK West

Postby Juxtaposition Records » Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:00 am

what i was reffering to was the point

No they had to otherwise hitler would have won and we would all be communist


obviously

User avatar
Milky Pisswit
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: In between my inbetweens...

Postby Milky Pisswit » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:13 am

kittenslayer wrote:and if you look back to the 1930s in Germany with hitler, that was a nazi state, and they were communists.



Commie Hitler :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Obviously that politics course you did paid off big time! Gotta love it when someone makes shit up to appear intellectual and it really just highlights their complete and utter ignorance.

Gold... :lol:
Last edited by Milky Pisswit on Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 600 character limit.

User avatar
MuscleMan
smut peddler
Posts: 11533
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:01 pm

Postby MuscleMan » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:15 am

kittenslayer wrote:They were both right tho, Japan didn't surrender until after the nuke. Infact alot of them still want to fight even after the nukes are dropped. Frankly i think they deserved that after what they did in the war!!!!


hiroshima was an atomic bomb, nagasaki was a hydogen bomb.

if they were nukes japan wouldnt exist today.

kittenslayer

Postby kittenslayer » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:19 am

after rethinking what i said i take it back... JAPANESE CIVILIANS don't deserve those atom bombs!!! What the Americans did was a crime!!!!!

User avatar
Bruticus
Posts: 5792
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 3:12 pm
Location: Guadalcanal
Contact:

Postby Bruticus » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:29 am

an@rchy wrote:hiroshima was an atomic bomb, nagasaki was a hydogen bomb.


Hydrogen bombs weren't even tested until the 50's
Image
If I had a bag of chips I'd eat them

User avatar
MuscleMan
smut peddler
Posts: 11533
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:01 pm

Postby MuscleMan » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:34 am

where did you read/believe that?

User avatar
Bruticus
Posts: 5792
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 3:12 pm
Location: Guadalcanal
Contact:

Postby Bruticus » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:41 am

School, you dumb cracker
Image
If I had a bag of chips I'd eat them

User avatar
MuscleMan
smut peddler
Posts: 11533
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:01 pm

Postby MuscleMan » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:44 am

well we saw a doco on the war, with the bombings as a focal point.

They disputed that the americans stated both bombs were atomic and between 23-25 megaton payloads, but analysts said the the blasts varied greatly, even though one was detonated still at altitude.

They speculated that the nagasaki blast, in nature was far more similar to a hyrogen bomb than an atomic device.

what better way to test a new toy than in a real-time situation?

much like the daisy cutters they used in "the war against terrorism"

User avatar
Bruticus
Posts: 5792
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 3:12 pm
Location: Guadalcanal
Contact:

Postby Bruticus » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:47 am

an@rchy wrote:They speculated that the nagasaki blast, in nature was far more similar to a hyrogen bomb than an atomic device.


A single documentary doesn't change the fact that neither of the bombs dropped on Japan were H-bombs, and considering they're speculating about the nature of a particluar bomb is no need to run around telling people things that contradict history books. Are you shooting for a writing position on Liz Shaws site?
Image
If I had a bag of chips I'd eat them

User avatar
MuscleMan
smut peddler
Posts: 11533
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:01 pm

Postby MuscleMan » Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:56 am

so you would believe that at that time of post war status, america would openly declare they were testing a new weapon on their enemies ally, or would they just say it was another atom bomb which is easily believed?

these analysts are military grade specialists, so yes I do believe that is truth.

User avatar
Bruticus
Posts: 5792
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 3:12 pm
Location: Guadalcanal
Contact:

Postby Bruticus » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:04 am

an@rchy wrote:so you would believe that at that time of post war status, america would openly declare they were testing a new weapon on their enemies ally, or would they just say it was another atom bomb which is easily believed?


Running before they could walk? Nazis were communists
Image
If I had a bag of chips I'd eat them

User avatar
MuscleMan
smut peddler
Posts: 11533
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:01 pm

Postby MuscleMan » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:12 am

running before you can walk is the story of wartime technological advances.

also evident in the yanky vs commy spacerace

User avatar
Grave Dancer
Posts: 10020
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 11:13 am
Location: faggot cunt

Postby Grave Dancer » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:28 am

cool this is interesting.
Image

User avatar
FC
Orange Ska Dork
Posts: 20816
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Postby FC » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:34 am

Nagasaki

On August 9, 1945 a plutonium fission bomb was detonated over the Japanese city of Nagasaki, three days after a uranium fission bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The bomb, called "Fat Man", was 128 inches long and had a diameter of 60.5 inches. It used implosion to compress the sub-critical assembly of plutonium. This kind of device had been tested less than a month before the drop, and was the subject of several other weapons tests after World War II. The explosive yield was about 20,000 tons of TNT, generated in about a microsecond.

The bomb was triggered to explode at a height of 550 meters (1800 ft), a height calculated to cause the widest area of damage.



Hydrogen Bomb

Because the thermonuclear explosive devices used hydrogen isotopes, (deuterium-tritium fusion), the resulting bombs were often called "hydrogen bombs". The first hydrogen bomb was detonated on November 1, 1952 at the small island Eniwetok in the Marshall Islands. It's yield was several megatons of TNT. The Soviet Union detonated a fusion bomb in the megaton range in August of 1953. The U.S. exploded a 15 megaton fusion bomb on March 1, 1954. It had a fireball 4.8 km in diameter and created a huge characteristic mushroom-shaped cloud. Analysis of the radioactive fallout from this bomb revealed it to be a fission-fusion-fission weapon, a "hydrogen bomb" with an outer sheath of natural uranium to increase the yield.




http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... mb.html#c6





Aidan
PertHJ wrote:I disagree with Aidans divergence from ska music, but agree with his correct use of scientific terms


Ois II Men|Hatewanx|XfrankgrimesX

User avatar
miss heart
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 3:23 pm
Location: Dragontown
Contact:

Postby miss heart » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:37 am

From NZ Idol... To Liz Shaw... To Bombs and Japan.

Good shit.
Life is not about the second chances, it's about a leettle mouse and his voyage to an exciting new land, that, my friend, is what life is.

User avatar
cheese
Posts: 5126
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 10:59 am
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Postby cheese » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:40 am

if you cant see a clear link between the 3 then you're very stupid
Back 2 Life wrote:cheese is better

User avatar
cirE
Posts: 17440
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: your face
Contact:

Postby cirE » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:47 am

Misfit wrote:From NZ Idol... To Liz Shaw... To Bombs and Japan.

Good shit.


8)
Future Shock wrote:freudian slip, went downa likea sack o potatoes

Image
0.21 6.78 3.31


Return to “Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests