Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Politics and the rest of world's madness all in here!
User avatar
mmmm....good crack
Posts: 4119
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: down
Contact:

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby mmmm....good crack » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:33 pm

lol great shit. Jesus she has a fusky clunge
Image

arkie
Posts: 1537
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:25 am
Location: hinternet
Contact:

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby arkie » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:38 pm

mmmm....good crack wrote:fusky clunge


Bahahaha!

User avatar
wassup rockers
Posts: 3251
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Auckland City

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby wassup rockers » Fri Jun 24, 2011 3:18 pm

why can't she seem to say anything that isn't dense as FUCK...

How would people feel about full time students not paying income tax while studying so they can progress with their studies and education? Of course, the offset is that students would be ineligible for any welfare payments such as the accommodation supplement? How do people feel about this?


hmm yeah i'm sure the ones that don't have jobs would fucking LOVE no accommodation supplement liz! oh they'll be more motivated to work? great, hope they do well in studies while stressing over unnecessary shit.

Liz Shaw ladies and gentlemen!

Image


it's been great Liz but can you please just FUK OF now.

User avatar
Lurch
Posts: 3614
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:27 pm
Location: Hillcrest, Hamilton

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Lurch » Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:08 pm

If she isn't just some sort of super troll then we need to take action now before she reaches Lhaws levels of douchebagery. (ie: She gets a talk back show... I think she is almost there on sheer stupidity)
Image

User avatar
Window Licker
Posts: 1693
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: Cnr Hoddle and Johnston

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Window Licker » Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:08 am

Image
Image

User avatar
akaxo
Posts: 8544
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: antichristchurch

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby akaxo » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:49 am

:lol: that is all kinds of awesome
We must secure the extinction of all people and no future for any children

User avatar
Window Licker
Posts: 1693
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: Cnr Hoddle and Johnston

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Window Licker » Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:49 pm

Image
Image

User avatar
Cosmo Kramer
Posts: 9886
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 3:27 pm
Location: LFH

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Cosmo Kramer » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:00 pm

aaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha

Imagefuck yeah - shove that up her arsehole
Image
Kramer Murphy and Associates

Fiction & Falsehood
Posts: 7506
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:38 am

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Fiction & Falsehood » Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:32 pm

nothing wrong with being your actual weight, believe me, im topping 100kg these days and its not brawn, if shes 50kg then im the 80kg i was when i was 17years old.
Image
“There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” -Mother Theresa

User avatar
kettles
Posts: 888
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Brighton UK
Contact:

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby kettles » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:29 am

mmmm....good crack wrote:fusky clunge


this had me in tears last night, top work

sneakers o'toole
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 5:48 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby sneakers o'toole » Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:35 pm

sidenote: Huey used to go out with Liz Shaw.

User avatar
wassup rockers
Posts: 3251
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Auckland City

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby wassup rockers » Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:40 pm

i wonder if they started off by swapping nudezz

meflex22.jpg 4 loosevag69.jpg

User avatar
Cosmo Kramer
Posts: 9886
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 3:27 pm
Location: LFH

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Cosmo Kramer » Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:19 pm

omg

who is huey?

he is off here isnt he?

Image
Image
Kramer Murphy and Associates

User avatar
Dennis from Accounts
Posts: 7757
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Third Floor, Accounts Department

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Dennis from Accounts » Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:40 pm

the guy who flexes
Forums Member of the Year (28.3%)

I've seen the future brother, it is murder.

User avatar
cirE
Posts: 17440
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: your face
Contact:

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby cirE » Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:44 am

wassup rockers wrote:i wonder if they started off by swapping nudezz

meflex22.jpg 4 loosevag69.jpg

oh god this gave me a huge unexpected laugh
Future Shock wrote:freudian slip, went downa likea sack o potatoes

Image
0.21 6.78 3.31

User avatar
cirE
Posts: 17440
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: your face
Contact:

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby cirE » Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:51 am

moar history lesson for cosmos [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOIRMe17imo[/youtube]
Future Shock wrote:freudian slip, went downa likea sack o potatoes

Image
0.21 6.78 3.31

Fiction & Falsehood
Posts: 7506
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:38 am

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Fiction & Falsehood » Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:53 am

some amusing commentary on liz shaws plan to make starting school at 5 years mandatory(its currently 6, but most start at 5 anyway)

Meryl White
Starting all children at the same time will do more harm than good if one child is simply not ready to attend formal schooling and develops a dislike of school - maybe if his or her parents had waited a year the child would be enthusiastic and enjoy learning. Timing makes a big difference to a small child's life. Again I ask, what qualifies you to develop early childhood education policy? What experience do you have with small children?

Having said this, I think this is another storm in a teacup. The vast majority of children in NZ start school at age 5, not 6. For a very small minority of children who start school later, that is their parent's right to bring up their child as they see fit. How does this policy fit with your claim that you are in favour of minimal government/freedom of choice? It seems rather contradictory to me.

10 hours ago.







Liz Shaw - Candidate for Auckland Central 2011 ‎@Meryl so by your logic some children shouldn't attend school because they lack the intelligence. That's not going to help the situation.
10 hours ago.







Meryl White What?! I'm honestly flabbergasted. How on earth was that my logic? I suggested some children were not ready for school at age five, but would be by six. In no way does that translate to "never attending school". Nor have you answered my previous questions.
9 hours ago.







Pedro Colsones
She didn't mention intelligence at all. I assume she had comparative maturity in mind, as in "will this child be disruptive attending school this early? Will starting school now impair this child's ability to adapt to the school environment?"
If you force the kid to start too early, you have a kid who resents and resists education. That could explain why a bit of leeway is allowed, giving each child a chance to start when they're most likely to adjust. Provided the leeway allowed isn't enough to make it too hard for a late-starter or early-starter to adjust and fit in with their new peers, then there's little problem with an informal 5-6ish starting age, surely

9 hours ago · 1 person.







Liz Shaw - Candidate for Auckland Central 2011 So are you suggesting all children who could be a potential problem be removed from the education system which will do more harm than good in the long run?!
Image
“There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” -Mother Theresa

User avatar
Rude Mike
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:26 am
Location: WEST FUCKN SIDE

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby Rude Mike » Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:02 pm

*facepalm
PILLAGE - http://www.myspace.com/pillagegppvt
Thrashing grinding powerviolence coming straight at you at the speed of death.

User avatar
ghetto ninja
Posts: 11424
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Knee deep in a suburban nightmare

Re: Building a bridge to burn- Liz Shaw

Postby ghetto ninja » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:16 pm

Holy fuck, she is overwhelmingly stupid. I can only imagine what she has to say about the Steiner kids that start at 7.
She shouldnt be allowed to vote let alone stand as an independant.
Martyrdamn wrote:Said 'hey baby gurl' to about seven girls tonight,
turns out girls don't like guys talking about getting up in their guts,
fagets, right.


Return to “Current Affairs”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests