sex offenders living under a bridge

Politics and the rest of world's madness all in here!
crain
niggativity scene
Posts: 5331
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: I've been very tempted.
Contact:

Postby crain » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:42 pm

bitch made her own porn tape too. it's fucked.
Image

...

Postby ... » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:01 pm

xDavex wrote:if it's on the internet, there is porn of it.


thanx for confirming the existance of childporn, altho not previously considered, i have no doubt that, knowing the nature of people, that there is probably beastiality childporn if you look hard enuff.

rule 34 hahaha :evil:

User avatar
xDavex
Unicorn Porninator
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:33 pm

Postby xDavex » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:03 pm

sometimes rule 34 is extremely disgusting. :(
Image

...

Postby ... » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:13 pm

i dunno, it strikes me that if it was socially acceptable to fuck children, but unspeakably obscene for men to live under bridges, you wouldnt be the one to go: 'hang on this aint right'

User avatar
Horus
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Blockhouse Bay

Re: sex offenders living under a bridge

Postby Horus » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:25 pm

xsfat wrote:"We're not monsters" and "They treat us like shit."

In the United States sex offenders can range from rapists and pedophiles to youngsters convicted of illegal but consensual relationships with minors.


Another victimless crime, punished in a cruel & unusual way.

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:49 am
Location: I'VE SAID MY BEEF

Postby yossarian » Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:50 pm

I think he might be referring to 2 consenting 17 year olds, you fucking idiot.

crain
niggativity scene
Posts: 5331
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: I've been very tempted.
Contact:

Postby crain » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:17 am

there is a very high incidence of black males being targeted with that particular law.
Image

User avatar
PertHJ
Inventor of 'LOAL'
Posts: 19847
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 8:53 pm
Location: Milano

Postby PertHJ » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:26 am

nazi scum wrote:I think the law would be more relevant in the example I used, you fucking idiot.


That's exactly it, the law is barely relavent to Horus's example.



way to miss his point though
http://hungjurynz.bandcamp.com/
http://www.discogs.com/user/pertHJ

Drinking beers, hell yeah!! Smoking dope, KICK TO THROAT!!

User avatar
Ben Fats
Party Girl
Posts: 2344
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 5:49 pm
Location: Steady Trollin

Postby Ben Fats » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:10 am

exactly
CHAINSMOKERS

User avatar
Horus
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Blockhouse Bay

Postby Horus » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:20 am

nazi scum wrote:Doesnt seem victimless to me, laws are to protect the weak and vulnerable in society. The idea is a minor does not have the reasoning capacity to make decisions in their best interests and so must be protected, by law.


No, laws are made to keep the powerful in power, and give everyone else the illusion that they ***might*** get justice (if they can cough up for an expensive-enough lawyer.)

And we all know that in any court case, its not about who is guilty, its not about "justice being done", its about who spends most on their lawyer.

But what I was referring to was two 15-yr olds having consensual sex. Just an innocent time for two lovebirds. But now, they are crims for life and condemned to live under a bridge with the pervos. What sort of sicko society is that?

...

Postby ... » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:19 am

Gangsta Nigguh Hard!! wrote:there is a very high incidence of black males being targeted with that particular law.

its always about black males with you.

got any hot links?

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:49 am
Location: I'VE SAID MY BEEF

Postby yossarian » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:20 am

nazi scum wrote:I think the law would be more relevant in the example I used, you fucking idiot.


A 17 year old can consent, a 4 year old can't.
You receive - 6 reading comprehension, -58 mana.

...

Postby ... » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:21 am

what about that 17 year old from nelson, he was on bail for fucking a 13 year old, so he goes and fucks a 12 year old?

hes got his prioritys straight.

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:49 am
Location: I'VE SAID MY BEEF

Postby yossarian » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:26 am

I think as long as we treat this rather delicate issue with sweeping generalisations and blanket statements and remember not too look at the merits of each case and the particular circumstances surrounding it, and who's pressing the charges, and make sure that if both parties are the same age, it's the mle that get's tried for stat rape, we'll be doing alright as a civilised society.

...

Postby ... » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:29 am

youre absolutely right.

we should get some placards with creatively spelled protests

'peedifils owt!

i know where theres a paediatricians office too, hang the bastards!

User avatar
xDavex
Unicorn Porninator
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:33 pm

Postby xDavex » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:32 am

yossarian wrote:I think he might be referring to 2 consenting 17 year olds, you fucking idiot.


just saying, the age of consent in most states is 16.
Image

User avatar
xDavex
Unicorn Porninator
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:33 pm

Postby xDavex » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:33 am

4th Reich Fighting Man wrote:i dunno, it strikes me that if it was socially acceptable to fuck children, but unspeakably obscene for men to live under bridges, you wouldnt be the one to go: 'hang on this aint right'


but, that's not the case.
Image

kittenslayer

Postby kittenslayer » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:14 am

4th Reich Fighting Man wrote:
Gangsta Nigguh Hard!! wrote:there is a very high incidence of black males being targeted with that particular law.

its always about black males with you.

got any hot links?

its always about white neo nazis with you.

got any hot links?

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:49 am
Location: I'VE SAID MY BEEF

Postby yossarian » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:16 am

xDavex wrote:
yossarian wrote:I think he might be referring to 2 consenting 17 year olds, you fucking idiot.


just saying, the age of consent in most states is 16.


It's 18 in california isn't it? I thought it was 18 in most states, but may be wrong, I'll have to check.

fuzz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby fuzz » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:22 am

Image
ages of consent worldwide.

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:49 am
Location: I'VE SAID MY BEEF

Postby yossarian » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:24 am

2 minutes on google wrote:Alabama 16
Alaska 16
Arizona 18
Arkansas 16
California 18
Colorado 17
Connecticut 15 (pc) 16 (npc)
D.C. 16
Delaware 16 (pc) 18 (npc)
Florida 18
Georgia 16
Hawaii 14
Idaho 16 (pc) 18 (npc)
Illinois 17
Indiana 16
Iowa 14(pc) 18(npc)
Kansas 16
Kentucky 16
Louisiana 17
Maine 16
Maryland 16
Massachusetts 16 (pc) 18 (npc)
Michigan 16
Minnesota 16
Mississippi 16
Missouri 17
Montana 16 (pc) 18 (npc)
Nebraska 17
Nevada 16
New Hampshire 16
New Jersey 16
New Mexico 17
New York 17
North Carolina 16
North Dakota 18
Ohio 16
Oklahoma 16
Oregon 18
Pennsylvania 16
Rhode Island 16
South Carolina 14 (pc) 16 (npc)
South Dakota 16
Tennessee 18
Texas 17
Utah 16 (pc) 18 (npc)
Vermont 16
Virginia 18
Washington 16
West Virginia 16
Wisconsin 18
Wyoming 16 (pc) 18 (npc)

Members - US Military 16
USA Citizen Outside USA 18


PC stands for parental consent, so unless you get your parents to sign a permission slip, a fair few states aim for 18.

Matt
Site Admin
Posts: 10639
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: Palmerston North
Contact:

Postby Matt » Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:06 am

Maybe he meant states as in nations, not as in 'bits of the USA'.

I like how that map has 'no data' for Thailand, haha. And that Yemen, it's cool to be 9...but only if you're married - otherwise it's just sick.

User avatar
XIBALBA
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:06 am
Location: in a borecore band

Postby XIBALBA » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:13 pm

ImageImage
Image

User avatar
captain steinakin
Posts: 3064
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:42 am
Location: under a volcano

Postby captain steinakin » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:21 pm

Matt wrote:Maybe he meant states as in nations, not as in 'bits of the USA'.

I like how that map has 'no data' for Thailand, haha. And that Yemen, it's cool to be 9...but only if you're married - otherwise it's just sick.


na, thailand is 15. the grey bit around it is burma
Image
Cowboy/Father/Mentor

User avatar
cirE
Posts: 17440
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: your face
Contact:

Postby cirE » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:07 pm

fun
Future Shock wrote:freudian slip, went downa likea sack o potatoes

Image
0.21 6.78 3.31

...

Postby ... » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:09 pm

Father Anderson wrote:
4th Reich Fighting Man wrote:
Gangsta Nigguh Hard!! wrote:there is a very high incidence of black males being targeted with that particular law.

its always about black males with you.

got any hot links?

its always about white neo nazis with you.

got any hot links?


yes, as a matter of fact i do... but will you click them?

...

Postby ... » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:10 pm

xDavex wrote:
4th Reich Fighting Man wrote:i dunno, it strikes me that if it was socially acceptable to fuck children, but unspeakably obscene for men to live under bridges, you wouldnt be the one to go: 'hang on this aint right'


but, that's not the case.


but thats not the point

User avatar
xDavex
Unicorn Porninator
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:33 pm

Postby xDavex » Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:45 pm

fair enough



and wow, i thought there were a LOT more states that were 16 than 18. I stand corrected, sorry dude!
Image

Kader
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:16 pm

Postby Kader » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:20 pm

yemen is the man.

...

Postby ... » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:59 pm

Kader wrote:yemen is the brutally repressed woman


Return to “Current Affairs”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests